.jpg)
Saturday, November 7, 2009
I guess the only other direction you can go after a very masculine beatdown on your ex-girlfriend is to feminize your next album cover with pants tighter than apple bottoms and the stance of a high-end top model? I don't know.. maybe I'm trippin, but this cover just doesn't sit well with me. For being such a high-paid artist, with 2 solo albums both debuting at #1, they say the third times a charm, and you gotta come harder than ever but damn Chris, you look softer than Evander Holyfield's ear the day Mike Tyson took a bite out of it. And what's up the cartoon-network looking characters that are supposed to illustrate the 'graffiti' vibe you're trying to sell. I blame his label for trying too hard to restore his image that has been forever altered and can no longer be what it used to be. Love the guy, I jam out to his music no matter what, but he better have songs that overlook his artwork or I foresee an overall album flop. Check out the mockery artwork mediatakeout did. Now that's just wrong. Lol, your thoughts?
-GL0
5 Comments:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
but yeah 'Graffiti' aint doin it for me either. It honestly looks like he raided Ciara's closet for that get up
When you think of graffiti you think of a hard, edgier, street, art not "cartoon-network creatures" that clearly didnt even make their cut.
graffiti is supposed to be on earth NOT in space.
the only comp i can give is maybe i like the boots . . .
Take a look at that funny emo video:
http://tinyurl.com/8b9p65