I guess the only other direction you can go after a very masculine beatdown on your ex-girlfriend is to feminize your next album cover with pants tighter than apple bottoms and the stance of a high-end top model? I don't know.. maybe I'm trippin, but this cover just doesn't sit well with me. For being such a high-paid artist, with 2 solo albums both debuting at #1, they say the third times a charm, and you gotta come harder than ever but damn Chris, you look softer than Evander Holyfield's ear the day Mike Tyson took a bite out of it. And what's up the cartoon-network looking characters that are supposed to illustrate the 'graffiti' vibe you're trying to sell. I blame his label for trying too hard to restore his image that has been forever altered and can no longer be what it used to be. Love the guy, I jam out to his music no matter what, but he better have songs that overlook his artwork or I foresee an overall album flop. Check out the mockery artwork mediatakeout did. Now that's just wrong. Lol, your thoughts?

-GL0